Soil Survey in NSW
 
Natural Resource Management

Soils in NSW

Soil Survey

Qualities and Limitations

Soil Qualities and Limitations

Landscape Qualities and Limitations

Land Capability

 

[ HOME ]

[ SOIL LINKS ]

[ SOIL REFERENCES ]

[ SOILS SITE MAP ]

[ CONTACT SOILS ]

 

Soil Landscape Mapping Program – Soil and Landscape Qualities and Limitations

Introduction

Soil Qualities and Limitations Landscape Qualities and Limitations Urban capability Rural capability

Soil Qualities and Limitations Acidification hazard Acidity Acid Sulfate Soils potential Alkalinity
Aluminium toxicity potential Erodibility Fertility Fire hazard
Hardsetting surfaces Non - cohesive soils Organic soils Periodically frozen soil (frost action potential)
Permeability (high) Permeability (low) Plant Available Waterholding Capacity (PAWC) Plasticity
Poor seedbed conditions Salinity hazard Shrink-swell potential Sodicity / dispersion
Stoniness Structural decline hazard Water repellence Wet bearing strength

 Soil Qualities and Limitations

Soil qualities and limitations are properties that can be assessed on an individual soil material basis and can affect the viability and sustainability of land uses. The effect of any particular soil quality or limitation may be positive or negative and will vary with site conditions and land use. The following qualities and limitations are listed for each soil material in tables within the soil landscape report for each soil landscape description. Where soil qualities or limitations are not widespread throughout the landscape, a localised qualifier is used.

 

Acidification Hazard.

Poorly buffered soils, especially those with expected buffering capacities of <30 kmol(+) ha/10 cm/pH unit show rapid increases in acidity. Soils can become more acid under land management systems that have net acid input, such as nitrogen leaching. Poorly buffered soils are usually sandy. In these soils, it is very important to maintain high organic matter levels. See Acidity.

Acidity.

Extremely and strongly acid soils with laboratory measured pH values of <5.5 (1:5 soil:water) often give rise to acid soil infertility. Associated problems include toxic levels of aluminium and/or manganese and deficiencies of most nutrients (especially calcium and molybdenum). While many native plants in eastern NSW have adapted to acid soil conditions, susceptible species may require heavy applications of lime or dolomite and often fertiliser to raise the pH (and nutrient supply) to a satisfactory level. Acid soils may corrode untreated underground metal installations.

Acid Sulfate Soils Potential.

Acid sulfate soils are clays, muds and sometimes sands associated with pyrite-rich marine sediments. They may also occur in association with some sulfidic ore bodies and sulfur-rich parent materials (e.g., some coals). These soils become extremely acid following exposure or drainage as sulfur compounds are oxidised and converted to sulfuric acid. This makes them corrosive to iron, steel, aluminium alloys and concrete. Underground services should be avoided or rust-proofed. Actual acid sulfate soils are too acid for most plant species and are difficult to vegetate. Very acid drainage waters from these soils can profoundly disturb aquatic ecosystems. 1:25 000 acid sulfate soil risk maps and an accompanying report are available for all low lying coastal areas in NSW from the Department.

Alkalinity.

Alkaline soils have laboratory measured pH (1:5 soil:water) values of >8.5. Alkalinity may inhibit the growth of plants. High levels of carbonate or bicarbonate may impair the uptake of iron, manganese, copper and zinc. These soils are frequently sodic or saline.

Aluminium Toxicity Potential.

High levels of soluble aluminium are often toxic to non-native plants such as some pasture, crop and ornamental species. Toxicity can be expected when exchangeable aluminium levels are >5% and soils are strongly acid. Many native plant species are tolerant of soils with high concentrations of soluble aluminium. Lime or dolomite can be applied to raise soil pH and thus reduce exchangeable aluminium.

Erodibility.

Soil erodibility is the susceptibility of a soil to erosion. It is based solely on soil properties. For sheet and rill erodibility, the USLE K factor (Wischmeier & Smith 1978) of >0.04 is considered to be highly erodible. In some cases, sheet and rill erodibility is modified according to field assessment of factors such as existing indications of previous sheet erosion, fabric and consistence that are out of range or not taken into account by the USLE. Rankings for USLE K factors in the Soil Test Results (Appendix 7.2 of the soil landscape reports) are very low (<0.01), low (0.01 - 0.02), moderate (0.02 - 0.04), high (0.04 - 0.06) and very high (>0.06). For the purposes of tables in chapter 4 of the soil landscape reports, these are more broadly defined as low (<0.01 - 0.02), moderate (0.02 - 0.04) and high (>0.04).

Landscape properties such as slope gradient, slope length, landform element and rainfall characteristics are not included in the assessment. Disturbance should be minimised on erodible soils, and disturbed areas should be protected by ground cover as soon as possible.

USLE K factors cannot be used alone to determine soil propensity to erosion by concentrated water flows. Dispersible/sodic soils, soils with weak or unstable fabrics such as slaking, or self-mulching or very sandy soils are also prone to erosion by concentrated flows.

Wind erodibility is related to the size and coherence of soil clods and only applies to dry and disturbed (or cultivated) soils. Wind erodibility is assessed in terms of percentage of fragments that are finer than 0.85 mm (USDA 1983).

Fertility.

Soils with poor chemical fertility usually require the application of chemical fertilisers, seasoned manure or compost to achieve permanent plant cover. Some soils do not respond well to normal applications of fertiliser. For example, soils with high aluminium or iron oxide contents readily "lock up" phosphate, making it unavailable to plants. Soil physical conditions often reduce plant growth.

In chapter 4 tables of the soil landscape reports, each soil material is ranked according to its suitability for soil conservation purposes of revegetation and topdressing. It is an assessment of the soil material as a growth medium and incorporates soil factors that are detrimental as well as beneficial to plant growth. Rankings used are -

Low. Not generally or only marginally suitable as a revegetation medium. Will have toxicity or extremely poor chemical fertility, and/or significant structural or water storage problems that will be expensive to overcome. Regular maintenance including applications of fertiliser and attention to soil moisture supply will be essential. Applications of ameliorants may also be necessary.

Moderate. Moderately suitable as a revegetation medium. Will have limited structural and/or water storage problems, and/or poor chemical fertility.

High. Desirable revegetation medium. Will have modest to good physical and chemical fertility with limited or no structural or water storage problems.

 

Fire Hazard.

Highly organic soils such as peats or litter build-up can be ignited by vegetation fires during drought. They may smoulder for months and are very difficult to control. Peat fires lower ground levels, sterilise the soil and in some instances, leave the ground bare for subsequent erosion.

Hardsetting Surfaces.

Hardsetting soils become hard, massive and compact when dry. They do not readily absorb rainwater and cause high runoff with consequent soil erosion. They do not offer favourable environments for seed germination and require careful water management. Regular cultivation should be avoided, although some cultivation may be necessary to break up the hard layer for successful germination.

Non-cohesive Soils.

Loose, sandy soils can be subject to severe wind erosion, gully erosion and batter failure. Batters steeper than 25% should be supported with retaining walls. Batters with slopes less than 25% should be revegetated quickly.

Organic Soils.

Soils with large amounts of organic carbon (generally >12% (Isbell 1996)) such as peats and sandy peats are generally unsuitable for use as engineering materials because they have low wet bearing strength and their physical properties may be subject to change through decay. They are generally well-structured for plant growth and have high waterholding capacities; however, they are often very acid and may require large quantities of lime and nitrogen as well as other nutrients and trace elements for optimum plant growth. Most topsoils contain sufficient organic matter to be unsuitable for engineering purposes. Also, highly organic soil materials located in swampy areas tend to suffer significant structural decline when drained.

Periodically Frozen Soil (Frost Action Potential).

Frost action potential is a rating for the susceptibility of the soil to upward or lateral movement by the formation of segregated ice lenses. It rates the potential for frost heave and the subsequent rapid loss of soil strength when the ground thaws and the ice crystals and lenses within the soil melt. Unequal heaving and subsidence upon thawing can crack or tip concrete slabs. In Australia, this hazard is generally recognised by the presence of large ice crystals in topsoils. Although most soils in Australia have zero frost action potential, a few colder areas may exhibit low frost action potential where damage to buildings and roads is unlikely, but still a possibility (Soil Survey Staff 1993).

Permeability (High).

Soils that drain water quickly are highly permeable. They usually have coarse textures (sands) and many interconnecting pores. They are not suitable for absorbing effluent from septic systems because liquid drains rapidly into the groundwater where it can cause pollution and potential health problems elsewhere. Soils with high permeability often have low waterholding capacities. Seedlings and newly established plants require regular, light irrigation.

Permeability (Low).

Soils of low permeability usually have very slow drainage and are likely to pond water for long periods. They usually have clayey textures and mottled or greyish colours. They are not suitable for absorbing effluent. Special drainage may be required. They may also be sodic and have low wet bearing strengths.

Plant Available Waterholding Capacity (PAWC).

Soil materials with low available waterholding capacity can store only limited amounts of water that can be extracted by plants. Plants growing in these soils require small and frequent applications of water for optimum growth. PAWC is of greatest importance in areas with seasonal rather than regular or highly unreliable rainfall. PAWC ratings in Soil Test Results (included in Appendix 7.2 of each soil landscape report) are very low (<5), low (5 - 10), moderate (10 - 15), high (15 - 20) and very high (>20). For the purposes of chapter 4 tables, these are more broadly defined as low (<5 - 10), moderate (10 - 15) and high (>15).

Plasticity.

Plastic state occurs at water contents where soils deform or change shape without change in volume. It occurs between the semi-solid (crumbly) and liquid state and is defined as the difference between the plastic and liquid Atterberg limits (Hicks 1991). A soil with high plasticity has plastic properties over a wide range of moisture contents.

Highly plastic soils are typically high in clay content and deform easily when mechanically stressed in the moist to saturated state. They are often tough and hard when dry, do not support loads well and have poor trafficability when wet. Soils with no or low plasticity change from solid to liquid with little change in moisture content and may be prone to mass movement (Hazelton & Murphy 1992). Highly plastic soils can be very sticky, are unsuitable for foundations and usually have low wet bearing strengths and high shrink-swell potential.

Highly plastic (HP) soils have USCS classifications of CH-CL, OH-CL, CL-OH, Pt, CH-OH, OH-CH, CH and MH. Moderately plastic (MP) soils have USCS class of CL-CH, CL, and OH. Low plasticity (LP) soils have USCS classes CL-ML, ML-CL, ML, CL and OL. Non-plastic (NP) soils include all other USCS categories and are sandy or gravelly.

Poor Seedbed Conditions.

Surface soil materials with properties that create difficulty in preparing adequate seedbed conditions, may be naturally cloddy, hardsetting, sandy or sodic/dispersible. Poor seedbed conditions are associated with very low organic matter, very high or low clay contents, and high silt and fine sand contents.

Salinity Hazard.

Excessive salt is toxic to most plants. Saline surface soils are usually bare or have sparse plant cover. These soils have a high erosion hazard and are often poorly drained. Treatment of saline soils often involves removal of saline water by drainage and deep ripping as well as establishment of salt-tolerant plant species. Cover crops, mulches and large applications of nitrogenous fertilisers as well as gypsum are often required for successful vegetation establishment.

Measures that further reduce concentrations of salts within the plant root zone such as tree or lucerne plantings in recharge areas may be required to ensure long-term rehabilitation. Saline soils may be corrosive to untreated underground services.

Shrink-swell Potential.

Expansive soil materials shrink and swell with changes in moisture content. Such soil materials have volume expansions of >30% or linear shrinkages of >17% and characteristics such as slickensides, seasonal cracking and high plasticity. When soil moisture content changes, shrink-swell soils can damage structures such as buildings, roads, dams, walls and underground services that are not appropriately designed. The shrink-swell potential of most soils can be reduced by compaction, the addition of lime or gypsum, or burial with a stable material. Keeping soil moisture levels constant can eliminate soil movement.

Sodicity/Dispersion.

Sodic and dispersible soils are often highly erodible and may have low wet bearing strengths. They are often very hardsetting when dry and often form surface crusts, restricting water entry and hampering seedling emergence. They are prone to erosion and structural degradation and require very careful management. Sodic soils may be treated with additions of lime or gypsum. Sodic/dispersible soils exhibit sodic/dispersible characteristics in the field. They are either highly dispersible (D% >50 or have an Emerson Aggregate class of 1, 2 or 3) or have an Exchangeable Sodium Percentage and sufficient sodium to be considered sodic.

Stoniness.

Gravels, stones and rocks increase the cost and difficulty of excavation for underground services and increase the difficulty of cultivation. Gravels, stones and rocks occupy soil volume, reducing plant exploitable moisture and nutrients. Surface stones can have mixed effects on water infiltration, soil erodibility and moisture loss through evaporation. Soils that contain more than 20 - 50% coarse fragments are considered to be stony.

Structural Decline Hazard.

Through inappropriate management techniques such as overgrazing and/or excessive cultivation when too wet or dry, soils may become structurally degraded over time. Structural decline usually involves at least one of the following-- increased soil bulk density, increased strength and cloudiness, decreased soil organic matter content, decreased soil porosity, and the formation of hardpans or hardsetting layers at or near the soil surface. Comparisons between different sites land uses, most notably between native or pristine areas and disturbed or developed areas, can often vividly demonstrate soil structural decline.

Management strategies to overcome structural decline include the use of mulches, appropriate crop and pasture rotation, reduce tillage or direct-drill practices, herbicide control of weeds, and more appropriate stocking rates.

Water Repellence.

Water repellence is rated after Roberts and Carbon (1971) according to the amount of time for a droplet of water to be absorbed by a dry soil surface.

The effects of water repellence include reduced water infiltration and poor germination and growth (Handreck & Black 1984) as well as increased runoff and increased erosion.

Wet Bearing Strength.

Soils with low wet bearing strength are dominated by a limited range of particle sizes. They are pliable and deform easily under pressure when wet. Quicksand is an example. If poorly drained, they can be unsuitable for foundations and have poor trafficability when wet. Low wet bearing strength soils often suffer severe structural damage if cultivated or mechanically disturbed when wet. Classifications used in chapter 4 tables of each soil landscape report are low (fluid or very soft mud), moderate (totally unripe to half ripe) and high (nearly ripe or ripe), rated according to their strength when the soil is not at field capacity (Pons & Zonnefeld 1965).

REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING

SOILS SITE MAP

[ TOP ]
Last Modified: 14 September 2005
Copyright
© NSW Department of Natural Resources